Hong Kong Gazettes New Anti-Spam Legislation

The new Hong Kong Unsolicited Electronic Messages Ordinance, was published in the Gazette on June 1, 2007 and is implemented in two phases to regulate the sending of commercial electronic messages.

The Deputy Secretary for Commerce, Industry and Technology, Mrs Marion Lai, said on May 28, 2007, that the Ordinance would regulate all messages advertising or promoting goods or services and were sent by electronic means, such as pre-recorded voice messages, faxes, emails, and messages through short messaging services (SMS) or multimedia messaging services (MMS).

All these messages with a Hong Kong link, such as a message sent to a Hong Kong telephone number, received in Hong Kong, or sent or authorised by a person in Hong Kong or by a Hong Kong company/organisation, will be regulated by the Ordinance.

The first phase of the Ordinance, took effect from June 1, 2007, and covers the use of unscrupulous techniques to reach out to more recipients, such as the supply of list of electronic addresses harvested from Internet webpages, or the actual use of address harvesting software to capture email addresses for sending commercial electronic messages without the consent of recipients, as well as other techniques such as "dictionary attacks" or "brute force attacks" commonly used by spammers.

The maximum penalty for these offences is a fine up to HK$1 million and imprisonment up to five years.

Fraud and other illicit activities related to the sending of multiple commercial electronic messages, such as hacking into computers to send commercial messages or use of zombie computers to send commercial electronic messages, are also prohibited with effect from June 1.

These types of illegal activities will be handled and investigated by the Police. The maximum penalty is a fine of any amount as determined by the court, and imprisonment up to 10 years.

The second phase of the Ordinance, which will come into effect by the end of 2007, will establish the rules for sending commercial electronic messages. For example, the following would be prohibited:
  • Sending pre-recorded voice messages to telephones with calling line identification withheld;
  • Sending commercial electronic messages without providing a way for recipients to opt out of receiving further messages;
  • Continuing to send commercial electronic messages to a recipient despite his/her unsubscribe request; or
  • Sending commercial electronic messages to an electronic address listed in the do-not-call registers, unless the consent of the registered users of those electronic addresses has been obtained.
"Under the second phase, members of the public could register their phone, fax and SMS/MMS numbers in a "do-not-call register" to notify all senders of commercial electronic messages that they do not wish to receive such messages.

"The exact commencement date of phase 2 would be decided later, as we have to discuss with the industry the implementation details of the relevant provisions, and to allow time for them to revise and update their information systems and practices. In addition, the Office of the Telecommunications Authority (OFTA) needs time to establish the do-not-call registers," Mrs Lai said.

The Telecommunications Authority will issue enforcement notices to those parties contravening the provisions. Failure to comply with enforcement notices may be subject to a fine of $100,000 on the first conviction, and up to $500,000 on the second and subsequent conviction.

Mrs Lai said that the UEMO would not cover person-to-person telemarketing calls.

"We believe that it is not appropriate at this stage to regulate person-to-person telemarketing calls so as to leave room for legitimate telemarketing activities. The Government, however, will closely monitor the situation and will consider whether to bring these calls under the ambit of the Ordinance if such calls cause serious problem in the community in future," Mrs Lai said.

Further information can be found at http://www.antispam.gov.hk



Comments

Display Order
This Blawg provides its readers with news, comments and insight on legal matters in Singapore. Information may come from many sources, where possible the primary source will be used and reproduced (if possible). Otherwise acknowledgement will be made to that source.
Panic Button